Effective conservation must stay clear about its mission — protect and restore the more than human world but it can’t pretend that mission exists outside of human history. The roots of American conservation are tangled with exclusion and eugenics, so dismantling white supremacy isn’t a distraction from the mission; it’s a way of ensuring that the mission finally serves everyone. The task now isn’t to choose between focus and justice, but to integrate both so that our stewardship reflects the world we actually live in.
I'd rather have 'eugenics and exclusion' environmentalism than Woke environmentalism.
I know you think alienating all self-respecting straight White men from environmentalism was worth it.
But it's why when people say 'how can you support Trump given his environmental record' I can easily say 'would you vote for someone you consider an eco-fascist, who you disagreed with on virtually all other issues, and who made it clear they wanted the exclusion of your group, purely on environmental issues?'
If the answer to that question is 'no', as I expect it is, don't expect me to vote for a Woke party purely on environmental issues; the utter disgust I feel towards your 'intersectionality' is identical to how you no doubt feel in regards to the above scenario.
Crawl back to mainstream 'Woke environmentalism', and let nature-loving patriots have their space.
Effective conservation must stay clear about its mission — protect and restore the more than human world but it can’t pretend that mission exists outside of human history. The roots of American conservation are tangled with exclusion and eugenics, so dismantling white supremacy isn’t a distraction from the mission; it’s a way of ensuring that the mission finally serves everyone. The task now isn’t to choose between focus and justice, but to integrate both so that our stewardship reflects the world we actually live in.
Lol, you're part of the problem.
I'd rather have 'eugenics and exclusion' environmentalism than Woke environmentalism.
I know you think alienating all self-respecting straight White men from environmentalism was worth it.
But it's why when people say 'how can you support Trump given his environmental record' I can easily say 'would you vote for someone you consider an eco-fascist, who you disagreed with on virtually all other issues, and who made it clear they wanted the exclusion of your group, purely on environmental issues?'
If the answer to that question is 'no', as I expect it is, don't expect me to vote for a Woke party purely on environmental issues; the utter disgust I feel towards your 'intersectionality' is identical to how you no doubt feel in regards to the above scenario.
Crawl back to mainstream 'Woke environmentalism', and let nature-loving patriots have their space.